Practice
Fraud, Deceptive Practices & Consumer Claims
The objective is not to characterize conduct as aggressively as possible. It is to characterize it accurately—and pursue the remedies that follow.
What may shape the claim
The words used, who made them, when they were made, what information was available and how the transaction proceeded can all matter. Written agreements may frame the relationship, while advertising, messages, invoices or other contemporaneous records may show what was represented and how the parties responded.
Not every broken promise or commercial disagreement is the same. Separating alleged misstatements, omissions, contractual obligations and later performance helps identify the factual questions without overstating what the record supports.
Records worth gathering
Preserve original records and their dates where possible. A clear sequence is especially useful when statements changed over time or passed through several people.
- Contracts, disclosures, advertisements and the materials presented before the transaction
- Emails, text messages, letters and notes of relevant conversations
- Invoices, receipts, payment records and account statements
- Documents showing what was delivered, performed, withheld or disputed
- A chronology identifying each material statement, response and resulting action
How related issues overlap
Fraud or deceptive-practices allegations may arise within a broader commercial, insurance or construction dispute. The contract, available coverage, claimed loss and litigation posture may each affect how the conduct should be evaluated and which remedies are actually in issue.
Discuss a matter
Share the basic facts and documents you believe matter. The firm will review the information before determining whether it can assist.
Contact Seltzer Counsel